rewriting this because for some reason I did not communicate very well- according to all the misunderstandings.
And why yes I have a degree in commercialism, communication and media. I clearly don't use it well.
When I go on the front page there will always be nudes. I've never bothered much with nudes, it's just people. In Europe in general we don't flinch at nudity nor sex. We show it on tv and encounter it as perfectly normal at a young age.
So for me nudity, or artistic nudes in this case; have never really bothered me. What do bother me is the attitude towards it on deviant Art. you can show your tits and vagina all you want for all I care honey- but I'ts far too 'appriciated' on the deviant Art front page and in it's daily deviantations.
Sure the female body have certain artistic features, and it's always been appreciated in art. Since the beginning of art actually. Statues, paintings and carvings of naked ladies and men have never been foreign to man.
But somewhere along the way naked men fell of the bandwagon and became 'inappropriate', especially on deviant Art. Why yes you can always find a picture of a penis if you wanted to, but you could also find a picture of overweight sonic having sex with a horse if you wanted to..
What I would like to know is why are nudity among artistic males more commonly banned and frowned upon in the light of deviant ART while low quality pictures of women jamming their fingers up their vagina appreciated ?
Don't get me wrong, I don't care for nudes or porn on deviant Art more than I care about sand in Sahara. I just don't understand the gap between female nudes and male nudes.
I hope I was clearer this time